Review: Be Dazzled by Ryan La Sala

Be Dazzled by Ryan La Sala

Published by: Sourcebooks Fire

Released: 1st January 2021 (in the US)

ISBN: 9781492682691

Read: 25-26 December 2020

This second novel by Ryan La Sala is different from his first, Reverie, in many ways, but of course, in so many others, it’s familiar. The queerness is alive and well, and it’s great to see a range of orientations represented so positively. Luca’s bisexuality is a major part of the narrative, and it’s welcome in YA.

But as our narrator, Raffy controls what we see, and when we see it. Flashing back has become a real trope, and I have grown weary of it. However, in this story, it serves as a release valve. The events in Raffy’s present timeline start badly and continue to disastrous, so to return to the past where he and Luca lean into their attraction is a glimpse into a happier time. Not that La Sala explains every event and misadventure. No, he leaves spaces for us to ponder: what exactly does Luca see in Raffy? Sometimes it seems as if he’s mostly spending time because of Raffy’s hobbies and flair. Also, the situation that develops with Inaya lacks detail. There is a lot of room for readers to come to their own conclusions, which is the type of book I love to advocate. Too many of them spell everything out and leave teens with little chance to explore ideas and motivations for themselves.

There are many twists and turns in this world of cosplay and costume design. We are treated to absent AND overprotective parenting. Friendships seem constantly on the cusp of breaking down, and Raffy’s own mental state is a thing of concern. But the immersion into this increasingly more mainstream space is fully realized. I have little awareness of manga worlds, devotion to fictional characters through crafting, and the influence of Youtubers and Instagrammers, yet I experienced Raffy’s stress and triumph completely and satisfactorily. This is the power of the author’s writing and his own knowledge and acceptance of the people who inhabit and commit to these fantastical communities. They own their weird and quirky ways, and we are better for such celebrations and joy.

I received this uncorrected proof thanks to Netgalley and Sourcebooks Fire. Highly recommended to teens who enjoy being part of a tolerant and inclusive community. To those who appreciate that breaking up can sometimes be a good thing, and who cheer on the underestimated and underappreciated. Be Dazzled has a wonderfully appropriate cover and comes out (in the US) on New Year’s Day, 2021.

Mystery Blogger Award

mystery-blogger-award

Thank you to Rachel from Scorpio Book Dreams for this surprising nomination in Okoto Enigma’s Mystery Blogging Award. To be honest, I forget there are people who read what I write. I prefer to pretend no one’s reading, so I don’t get caught up worrying about reactions.

Rules:

  1. Put the award logo/image on your blog
  2. List the rules.
  3. Thank whoever nominated you and provide a link to their blog.
  4. Mention the creator of the award and provide a link as well
  5. Tell your readers 3 things about yourself
  6. You have to nominate 10 – 20 people
  7. Notify your nominees by commenting on their blog
  8. Ask your nominees any 5 questions of your choice; with one weird or funny question (specify)
  9. Share a link to your best post(s)

Three Thing About Me:

  1. My life has been in turmoil for the past two years, and I can’t see it returning to the way it was. And that’s okay. It’s moved on, in a different direction. I just wouldn’t mind a bit more certainty with work and money.
  2. I maintain eight separate email accounts. For no reason that makes any sense. *shrugs* It’s just the way it is
  3. I am about to become a Great-Aunt for the first time, and that’s pretty exciting.

Five questions answered:

1. What is your biggest bookworm confession?
 I read trashy romance novels on my kindle in between my YA. Hush now, don’t judge me.
2. What series do you re-read the most?
The Lumatere Chronicles by Melina Marchetta. I find myself revisiting them every couple of years. I know if I pick up Finnikin of the Rock, I won’t be able to NOT read the next two as well. It is an amazing series, full of flawed heroes and extraordinary circumstances. Highly recommended.
3. What fictional place would you most like to visit?
Maybe Cello in Jaclyn Moriarty’s The Colours of Madeleine series. But only if Elliot was with me to keep out of trouble when the weather changed.
4. What’s your favourite piece of bookish merchandise?
An ex-student gave me a perfect pair of owl bookends. I love them!
bookends
5. Which five authors (living or dead) would you invite to a dinner party?
Firstly, two of the most clever writers I know–Fiona Wood and Christine Bongers–so they can keep up with the intellectual conversation from my favourites of all time–Philip Pullman, Neil Gaiman and Alexander McCall Smith, while I sit and observe.

Nominations:

I am embarrassed to admit that I don’t spend time on too many other blogs. I am more likely reading reviews and recommendations through Instagram and Litsy. But these three people have excellent blogs that I do visit and read.

Clare @ofceilingwaxandotherthings
Elle @ellebiblio
Liz @lizderouet 

I will post to their timelines and see if they want to participate.

Here are my 5 questions:

  1. Why should people read more?
  2. How do you approach your book reviews?
  3. Are you a blurb reader? A cover judge? Or, read what’s trending? How do you select books?
  4. Can you see what the next big trend in YA might be?
  5. Is there a screen adaptation that lives up to its book origins?

My Best Post Ever? The most popular? Or I one I like the most? 

So I explored my stats (huh. Who knew there was so much to learn?) and discovered my most read review is this one. I love all of Julia Lawrinson’s books, and it makes me happy that she visits my blog and has a look at my reviews #squee. But I have had lots of people land on my Best of 2016 lists. Just the thought of trying to match those lists this year makes me squirm. Oh how fearless I was when I was younger (a year ago).

Thanks Rachel for asking me to do this. Sorry it took so long to get it up. I have been working on it for a while now.

Surveys (in draft form)

My case study is quite different from many others, in that I am completing it on behalf of others. This causes me some angst because I am not receiving feedback from the invested parties (Megan & Jackie) as quickly as I would like. I created three surveys that will be used with the parents, the teachers, and the students of the school, and either Megan and Jackie say ‘oh it looks good’, and don’t reply at all.

I need to impress on Megan and Jackie the need to study the wording, the multiple choices, and the range of questions carefully to ensure we are tapping into the heart of our goals. But they are busy, I get that. Maybe you can help. Here  are the three surveys. What do you think? I don’t want to ask too many questions of parents. I do not want to put the words ‘digital technologies’ into the mouths of teachers. I want them to come up with them. As for students, I want to give them words, but also let them have a chance to choose their own as well.

The Parent Survey

The Teacher Survey

The Student Survey

It’s a start. I think I am on the right track.

I have also added another comment to the VoiceThread – a very short summary of my meeting with Megan and Jackie.

Case study proposal

prettything

Impact of a collaborative planned K-6 Library Program

Proposal Topic: To what extent has the introduction of a K-6 library program in the St Aidan’s Junior Library impacted on formal teaching and learning, on the profile of the library, and on the students themselves? What unexpected positive results have occurred?

Description: Teacher Librarians Megan Daley and Jackie Child are colleagues at St Aidan’s Anglican Girls’ School. Two years ago, they designed a physical space in their junior library to incorporate a K‑6 program which combines literature, digital technologies, and makerspace activities. Over that time, the program has developed and grown through review and collaboration. This case study plans to examine the goals of the program, and measure the level of success. These goals include:

  • Incorporating elements of the Digital Technologies Curriculum (DTC)
  • Developing lifelong learners and readers
  • Promoting Computer Science and Engineering careers to girls
  • Raising the profile of the junior school library, and promoting it as a community hub

As well, the study will examine the impact on formal teaching and learning by surveying teachers, the perception of the program and the library in the school community by surveying parents, and the impact on students by surveying them. It will also reflect on any unexpected outcomes.

 Expected outcomes:

  • To articulate the vision and the goals of the K-6 program over the last two years, and analyse changes in the light of review
  • To identify skills and processes the students have developed that align with the DTC
  • To measure the impact of a library program on formal teaching and learning
  • To examine the perception of libraries and their role in the wider school community
  • To survey invested parties to gather feedback on explicit and informal learning.
  • To evaluate the impact on students
  • To reflect upon unexpected consequences and how this impacts on the program in the future
  • To use the gathered and analysed data to put forward recommendations

Case Study Plan:

August 29 – September 2

  • Meet with Megan and Jackie to articulate their vision.
  • Conduct a literature review on the growth of makerspaces and the way libraries change to remain relevant, and to support teaching and learning.
  • Design surveys appropriate for each group

September 5 – 16

  • Conduct surveys and interviews
  • Continue with Literature review

September 19 – October 10

  • Collate and analyse survey findings
  • Write up findings and recommendations
  • Write up critical reflection

Learning Analytics, the Participatory Web and me

There is often a disconnect between the aspirational rhetoric of academic theory and the realities of the classroom. It is sometimes difficult to imagine a school where the digital concepts of this course are aligned and balanced. While it is easy to use the jargon in assignments and critical reflections of the blog posts, it’s not so easy to sound like an innovator, an achiever when asked to present real-life case studies.

All this seemingly changes now with INF537. We are suddenly exposed to articles and experts who are critically evaluating the work of academics, claiming that educational technology is not progressing quickly (Selywn, 2010), nor in all the best directions (Ross, 2012). We are now offered opportunities to question and critically examine the theories and the contentions, and acknowledge the gaps between research driven data providing ‘should’ and ‘must’ conclusions, and the constraints placed upon schools to act upon them (Selwyn, 2014).

It’s a frustration experience reading, learning and reflecting on the possibilities and then taking the ideas into schools, only to be hit with ‘slow down’, ‘wait a minute’ and ‘we need a committee to decide that’.

Ultimately, unfortunately, such delays can wear a person down (not me, of course, I am just saying).

One area that never seems to improve in schools is immersion into the participatory web. No matter how much academics argue for the many benefits for students who collaborate, comment and reflect in open, online communities, there is too much concern about privacy and criminality (Campbell, De Bois & Oblinger 2007, in Long & Siemens, 2011) given students’ ages for it to ever gain a strong foot-hold. However, freedom to interact in virtual worlds blossoms once students reach tertiary institutions, and evidence from learning analytics indicates that students who interact regularly with their online management course work, and in other networks (social or otherwise) achieve better (Long & Siemans, 2011). But while there are questions around the validity of the data and the conclusions reached by learning analytic models (Welsh, 2016), it continues to be mined, particularly in higher education.

Interestingly I have found learning analytics being used at a private girls’ school, where I have just started a six-week contract. Unsurprisingly, it is the Academic Mentoring Program that is its strongest advocate. They encourage teachers to access the dashboard data available through the school’s LMS to analyse, compare and identify potential at-risk students. They also want the teachers to use it to inform and develop their own practice.

I am excited by the way the college is determining professional practice in teachers. I have only been there for two weeks, and already I can see there is strong expectation on staff to take responsibility for lessons that leverage digital media, that they understand their accountability to student success, and that they make use of all the programs and technology available to them. It’s the strongest example I have seen of teachers being challenged to consider the future of pedagogy and the implications for their changing practice.

I hope this will translate to exciting and authentic project opportunities for assignment three.

References:

Long, P., & Siemens, G. (2011). Penetrating the Fog: Analytics in Learning and Education. EDUCAUSE                    Review, 46(5).

Ross, J. (2012). The spectacle and the placeholder: Digital futures for reflective practices in higher                             education. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Networked Learning (pp. 227–                   244). Retrieved from
http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fss/organisations/netlc/past/nlc2012/abstracts/pdf/ross.pdf

Selwyn, N. (2010). Looking beyond learning: Notes towards the critical study of educational technology.                  Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 65-73. doi:10.1111/j.1365- 2729.2009.00338.x

Selwyn, N. (2014). Education and ‘the Digital’. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 35(1), 155-164.                 doi:10.1080/01425692.2013.856668

Welsh, S. (Presenter). (2016, 24 July 2016). Learning Analytics: A Traveller’s Guide. [online colloquium]

Coordinated social media campaign

Yesterday the CBCA announced its yearly Book of the Year Awards Short Lists. While the official lists go public on the website at midday, there is always concern about overloading the site, and this year there was the addition of approximately 300 people together at the conference hearing the announcement live.

With such pressures, we plan a coordinated social media campaign to share the message to a range of relevant platforms, primarily to relieve some of the burden from the website, but also to reach people through their preferred medium.

This is another example of the power of digital environments by showing flexibility for their audience. We are aware that the people most interested in the Short List are educators, public libraries and book sellers. While social media may be not available through government school networks, that is not true for businesses or libraries. Allowing them to access the information through Twitter, Facebook or even Instagram, means fewer people are on the website, allowing those whose only means is through that channel, to have quicker access.

With four different people working on different platforms simultaneously, the lists were shared through a consistent series of images.

2016 SL

On Twitter:

For over 2 hours, we were trending on Twitter. I suspect it helped that the conference attendees were also tweeting madly. trending

 

Although not as popular on Instagram, we received ‘likes’ from people not on other platforms, or who came to this one first.

instagroup

 

 

 

Facebook was a similar story. Each post received somewhere between 11 and 36 ‘likes’ and between 2 and 13 ‘shares’. Not sure why the Eve Pownall list was so popular. Perhaps because it was posted last, and by that time people realised their own power to engage.

EP FB

Lastly, at approximately 5 pm, we posted them to the Reading Time blog, to coincide with the newsletter distributed to our subscribers once a week. This way, it would be the top post, allowing it to reach another group of relevant persons.

Finally, a quick look at the hourly statistics for the website yesterday.

BOYA stats

Just after midday we hit a peak of over 1 000 hits, with the overall number approximately 4 500 across the whole day. [stats by Google Analytics].

Such a plan requires collaboration and preparation. While not strictly a digital ‘learning’ environment, it is a situation targeting people in the business of teaching and learning, and is often administered and organised by educators in their own time. Having to work with people I have never met in person, who live all across Australia is my current reality, and puts me in good stead for when I return to a library and a school, because all of our experiences in a virtual space can translate to real life, and can allow me to connect with students who are clearly living these online lives in myriads of ways.

 

 

 

 

Digital Learning Environments beyond schools

It is not only educational institutions that seek out user-friendly apps and software to allow students and staff to connect, not just within classrooms and across schools, but also across borders and oceans. Volunteer not-for-profit organisations also need ways to develop projects and partnerships, and it’s more likely they are dealing with people not even in the same industry.

oldsite

The Children’s Book Council of Australia is about to launch its new website. All the content remains essentially the same, but we are aiming for a fresh look, an easier environment in which to work, and a better way to link into the numerous social media accounts we have built up over the years. I have been part of the National website team since about 2008, and it wasn’t much later than that, we started talking about upgrading, up-styling, up everything.

(If there’s one thing annoying about technology, it’s the need to keep upgrading constantly. Nothing stands still.)

As with most not-for-profits, money is tight, so the website stayed as is for many years, longer than it should have, to be honest. While others moved on to weeblys, or wordpress sites, we maintained our site as best we could, and started using other means to communicate with members and interested parties. Sites such as Facebook, Twitter and Instagram (admittedly, that is my Qld Branch Instagram account).

We also moved into the digital world with our printed journal ‘Reading Time’. Subscribers dropped to below 1 000, and it wasn’t financially viable for us to continue. We set about creating an online review site, that after two years, boasts an audience of over 10 thousand page views per month.

RTOstats

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(statistics via Google Analytics)

While it hasn’t been a decision that everyone liked (Disappointed to have lost access to our printed journal was a typical response in the early days), we just couldn’t justify such an outlay, given how few people were reading it. We now appear on Google searches, we have an email for subscribers, and people can comment and link back to our reviews from their sites. This has such potency and such reach only afforded by a thriving digital environment (Ito, et. al., 2012).

RTOBack to the website. Over the past 6 months, I have been part of a team that stretches from South Australia to Queensland. Deb is in NSW, and the two web consultants who have been with us from the beginning, Murray and Dave are based in Melbourne.

newsite1

newsite2newsite3

newsite4

Initially we communicated primarily through emails, but the threads reached so far back, it was impossible to keep track of who was attending to what, and precisely which tasks had been completed by whom. We then included skype meetings once every couple of weeks, where we able to talk, and view the website on our own screens, as we discussed various design issues, and the implementation of features that allowed best viewing on mobile devices.

The Object Media team also introduced us to Trello.

Trello

This collaborative platform made it possible for us to target specific jobs and allocated relevant persons, who could then update the rest of us on progress without needing to send emails. Its layout design is user-friendly and it’s easy to see all the elements at a glance. We could also ask each other questions, and if anybody made any changes, an email notification ensured I was aware, allowing me to choose a time to view the Trello board at my convenience.

These digital environments are only just a few that can be accessed while working through a project. This example demonstrates why it is necessary to use collaborative online web 2.0 tools with students. They will be required to work on them after leaving school, so anything educators can do to ensure students learn to communicate appropriately in the virtual world, will assist them, and make their working life better (Greenhow, 2012).

Our new website is now live.

It has been a lot of work behind the scenes. One of my main jobs has been to insert the last three years (2013 – 2015) worth of Book of the Year award winners into a searchable database. It is hoped that with continued entry of backdated awarded books, this will have the potential to be invaluable to librarians seeking quality Australia literature within a defined subject category. A long term goal.

References:

Cyberlearning Videos (2012, February 6). Christine Greenhow: Help from my friends: Social network sites and the future of cyberlearning [Video file]. Retrieved from http://youtu.be/zk9GA1KErc4.

Ito, M., et.al. (2012). Connected Learning Summary. Retrieved from DML Hub: http://dmlhub.net/sites/default/files/ConnectedLearning_summary.pdf.

Group Collaboration

I have been very happy with our group’s collaborative efforts. Adam, Adele and Nat are terrific workers, excellent thinkers, and very supportive colleagues. We have a 20 page Google doc, where we have, for the past week, shared our thoughts on the topic and our individual understanding of it, and what we want to achieve. There are four different colours representing four speakers and mostly there’s purple.

Yes, that’s me. I tend to say/write/ramble a lot. It’s not –

‘we should do this…’

‘I think this is right’

It’s more –

‘maybe this might work…’

‘what do you guys think?’

‘Julie says …’

‘I read somewhere that….’

And while it’s sometimes frustrating not to get an answer straight away, it’s terrific to look back and see how much we have interacted, we have all had our say, and we have come up with a hypothesis that somehow fit all our specific needs.

collaboration

Most importantly, it’s been fun, productive, and effective. Now onto the hard bit. Making this happen

100words

 

Authentic information in a socially networked world

Transformational learning does not need a lot of money, nor a three year plan (Heick, 2015), it just needs to change the approach to learning. It is a massive shift, but it can be done with the tools that are available through Web 2.0, and the library 2.0 paradigm.

Wikipedia has been part of the transformation of knowledge. It’s the most widely used online resource (Garfinkel, 2008), and information professionals need to address the challenge it presents. While it’s clear that a large majority of its articles are accurate, their commitment to the philosophy of verifiability is troublesome. This is a fairly complicated standard to explain to young people – but add it to the reasons why Wikipedia appears so highly in a Google search, and a compelling argument for dissuading students to use Wikipedia emerges (Garfinkel, 2008). We do live in a connected world, one that allows for open and transparent collaboration, but teaching children and young people to be critical about sources like Wikipedia for assignment work is an important part of the role. The implications extend from small ripples such as the concern about plagiarism, right through to the extreme end, where journalist are interviewing fraudsters due to not checking credentials. Crediting sources and verifying information must happen if we are to maintain a high standard of the traditional notion of accurate news and information (Garfinkel, 2008).

As well as alerting students to be discerning about the misrepresentation of information, educators need to also be mindful of the implications of personal misrepresentation. Creating online identities is almost second nature to these ‘NetGenners’ (Lorenzo, 2007) and young people can be pressured into making ill-informed choices about how to present themselves. The furore over the MySpace angle shot (Sessions, 2009) showed the level of anger directed towards people who used such deceptive methods. It’s interesting that of all the issues young people could get upset about, this is the one that stirs them up. Wanting others to represent themselves ‘authentically’ (Sessions, 2009) is a legitimate desire, and yet some of the comments, the exposures can only be described as mocking and cruel. Not only can informational professionals conduct a dialogue about the merits of being authentic on-line, but they can also discuss the importance of tolerance and compassion towards others who may not have very high self-esteem.

Making use of Web 2.0 tools to reach out to students to support their information requirements, and to teach them positive digital citizenship makes the job much easier. These are the platforms where young people reside. This is their domain. We need to get a foothold into them.

References

Garfinkel, S. L. (2008). Wikipedia and the Meaning of Truth. Technology Review, 111(6), 84-86.

Heick, T. (2015, May 21). Tomorrow’s Learning Today: 7 Shifts To Create A Classroom Of The Future. Retrieved 21 May 2015, from http://www.teachthought.com/trends/shift-learning-the-7-most-powerful-ideas-shifts-in-learning-today/

Lorenzo, G. (2007). Catalysts for change: Information fluency, Web 2.0, Library 2.0, and the new education culture. (March). Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20110409150214/http://www.edpath.com/images/IFReport2.pdf

Sessions, L.F. (2009). “You looked better on MySpace”: Deception and authenticity on Web 2.0, First Monday, 14(7), 6 July. Available   http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2539/2242

Update on Year 7 social networks

As with anything introduced to a class that is not assessed or connected to the curriculum in an explicit way, the follow through by students is going to be varied. But generally, the number of boys who jumped on board, has been limited. Because most boys didn’t use their social media site voluntarily, I initiated a new rule. Cards would not be stamped by staff unless the students showed they had contributed a review. I made it mandatory. I mean, it always was, but until I actually gave an incentive to write, they didn’t complete the task.

Still, they use it sparingly and in superficial ways. No matter how much I push the idea that social media can be used in different contexts, they do not treat it like it’s worthy of their best efforts. As well, each site has drawbacks that have implications for boys being able to use it appropriately.

Because each class is quite different, it is not clear whether the best app is the best app because it is being used by the best class, or if it’s the app itself. I want to highlight some of the positives and some of the negatives that have been discovered during the last two months.

Note this term, all classes are reading Dragonkeeper by Carole Wilkinson (2003) as their English novel, so it has been used as a way to start discussions and receive comments. Also, each image is a thumbnail to limit their size and space they use. Click on the image to see it in more detail.

 

7A Goodreads

Positives. I have been able to create a private group, so that students can discuss a book together without it being public. I have started two discussion boards about Dragonkeeper, and students have been adding comments and thoughts about it. (see image on right). It also allows those boys who are ardent readers to add more books from their reading history, and keep a record. They can also create shelves, and update reading progress and comment along the way. They can connect to other readers outside the groGR discussionup and find books similar to ones they like. (see image on left. Zak has not read 45 books since we started this activity).

GRexample

 

 

 

 

Drawbacks. It is difficult to use at school because the website is classed as ‘social network’, and our security system (Netbox Blue) blocks its content and students can’t always get on. Also, our network sometimes makes it impossible for students to create their account at school, so I had to rely on them doing it at home, and without constant reminders, some students did not create a log on. The mobile app version, used on the boys’ iPads did not always work consistently with the group account. Boys found it difficult to locate the poll, and comment through the discussion topics. It was also not clear how to reply to other’s posts. The app has been frustrating for all of us. It is impossible for me to ask the boys to complete work on Goodreads at school because not all students will have access.

 

7B Blackboard Blog

Positives. This is the most difficult class, in terms of both ability and behaviour (coincidence? I think not). Putting them onto the most controlled environment was deliberate. It didn’t require them to create a new log on, or have to deal with a new site. It only allows them to add posts, and comment on others. It is totally private and no one else can see what they are posting.

Drawbacks. It is not very appealing in terms of design or format. It doesn’t allow the students any freedom to customise or personalise. It is evident, based on the comments on this particular post (see image below) that the students are not inclined to be thoughtful or relevant. They also write very little about their own reading. (see image on right) bbblogdiscussionbbblogcomments

 

 

 

 

 

7C Wikispaces

Positives. I like that this site forces the boys to learn to be creative with the technology as well as using it as a writing tool. Each student has to design their own page, which has been a challenge for a lot of them. Students can easily access and see what other classmates are reading, and have been extremely happy to comments on each other’s pages. I added a page specifically about Dragonkeeper, which has added to their conversations (see image on left).
wiki DK talk

 

 

 

 

Drawbacks. The students have really struggled with having to create their own pages. The image upload and insert is glitchy, and students’ book covers are being replaced when others upload, and that really isn’t good enough. Lots also struggled to create a log on. If they didn’t manage to complete that task in class with me walking them though it on the first day, they then had it do it alone and some took a month to finally join the group. This is the only site where boys ‘nark’ each other. One student has told me he is not going to post again, so I will have to sort that out. Here are a couple of examples of the best and worst attempts so far. (see below images).

nicks pagerileys page

 

7D Riffle Books

Positives. It has been easy for the students of this class to find and ‘follow’ each other (see image on left). riffleexampleIt’s a clean and uncluttered space, and there is a simple way to add books and reviews. There is a nice feature which allows members to create lists, and some students have taken the opportunity to do that. Here is the profile of the most prolific reader. (see image on right)jack m

 

 

 

Drawbacks. It’s a relatively new site and being US based, it often doesn’t have the Australian books that my boys read. We have been unable to use it as a way to confirm the book has been read. It also doesn’t have the option (which GR does) for people to manually add titles. It doesn’t let me create a group, or a poll, and there isn’t the option to create shelves, or update reading progress.

 

7E Edmodo

Positives. It is another uncluttered space, which is very user-friendly. I created polls, to which the boys responded enthusiastically (see image on left). It is easy to work on simultaneously, and it has been the edmodopollsmost active site of all of the ones used. It works like a facebook page, so it encourages short, snappy posts, although images are easily added. I think it is just the calibre of this class, but their posts have been the most articulate, the most thoughtful (see image on right).edmodocomments

 

 

 

 

Drawbacks. Another example of a place where students have to be invited, and if something goes amiss with them receiving the group code, or not setting a log on in a timely fashion, some boys delayed their inclusion for a long time.

 

7F EduBlogs

Positives. As with the case of the wiki, the ability to allow students to learn how to create their own space is highly desirable. A blog gives students more freedom, more flexibility, and more ownership. It really is their space. Here are some examples: Sam’s; Artie’s and Jack’s.

Drawbacks. It is much harder for the students to comment on each other’s posts. They have to log into mine first, then log into the person’s blog, and then sign into Edublogs again, to ensure their comment is identifiable. I also had some boys who still haven’t created a blog, and following up on this has become a discipline issue, one I would rather not have to pursue.

This has been the most frustrating part of the exercise with the majority of the classes, and it is a reminder that getting students set up deserves quality time devoted to it. Although the use of social media has not been consistent throughout, and the sites themselves are often unreliable, the main outcome was to improve borrowing rates and give Year 7s incentive to read. I believe that result has been achieved.